Yep, and it's also going to hit a lot in their 50s too. The chancellor is also considering pushing this up to 69.Wales4rugbyWC23 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 30, 2024 11:32 amFor those of us in our forties that is the age we will start to receive the British state pension.Bubblegun wrote: ↑Tue Jan 30, 2024 8:49 am I don't think it is worth delaying the pension. The break-even point for deferring is about 20 years. Taking into account that the average life expectancy is 80 in the UK, we are throwing the dice. and generally, as we get older we tend to spend much less, and in poorer health.(something most people forget)
https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/savin ... e-pension/
So the break even point if we delay our pension from 67 to 68 yoa is 88 years old. Each year deferred only gives us about 5% extra.
I will say this though, I'll IGNORE the AVERAGE life expectancy because I think the best figures to consider are what is called the QUALY. Quality Adjusted Life Year. or even better the Healthy Life Expectancy or HALE which shows we fall short before we collect our pensions. It isn't talked about much, because clearly, politicians want us all to think we are living longer and healthier lives, and most people don't work in health care and have never heard of these.
So when we consider the FINANCIAL BENEFIT of deferring our pension, I think we should also consider the HEALTHY LIFE EXPECTANCY. No point getting an extra 5% or 10% if you can't go anywhere and we're stuck at home. I don't want to blindly follow what the chancellor is saying. He has a bank balance to consider but its us in the real world that have to balance, our quality of life, and a healthy life.
Food for thought.
https://www.ft.com/content/68557f93-975 ... 74b64500f7
This is the retirement paper/calculations from HMRC
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... etable.pdf