Nerd's comparison of MSCI Kokusai funds and ETF

Post Reply
Ori
Veteran
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2017 2:16 pm
Location: Kanagawa

Nerd's comparison of MSCI Kokusai funds and ETF

Post by Ori »

I'm trying to choose the first fund for my portfolio - MSCI Kokusai-exJapan, but kind of confused by what I see and was hoping that someone can answer my questions.

Here are the shortlisted mutual funds and ETFs:
1) ニッセイ-<購入・換金手数料なし>ニッセイ外国株式インデックスファンド
2) 1550 (seems to be popular here)
3) 1680
5) The new VT proxy from Rakuten

First, I've tried to compare fees and were quite surprized, because usually they say that an advantage of ETF comparing to MF is low expense ratio. But that is not what I see...
If I understand correctly, than the expense ratio they show on SBI or Rakuten fund pages are not correct, and one has to look at the fund datasheet for other fees, especially 実質的な負担 for fund-of-fund schemes.
For examlple:
1) ニッセイ-<購入・換金手数料なし>ニッセイ外国株式インデックスファンド(https://www.rakuten-sec.co.jp/web/fund/ ... 90C0009VE0) - on Rakuten page is says thay ER is 0.216%, but in fund datasheet there are additional 0.0108%, so 0.2268% in total.

With ER it it more tricky:
2) 1550: on SBI page is says 0.15%, but in the fund datasheet (http://www.am.mufg.jp/pdf/koumokuromi/1 ... 170908.pdf, p.13) it's 0,162% (due to taxes, I guess) and additional 投資信託証券 0.108%, which gives total 0.27%. And then there is this 実質的な負担 0.27% which, I assume, is not an additional fee, but just a sum of the two previous fees (can someone confirm this???). And then there are その他 0.0081, 0.0081 and 0.05, which gives total ER of 0.3362%.
3) 1680 (https://www.nikkoam.com/products/etf/li ... ko/outline): similar to 1550, the initial 0.15% becomes 0.37%. WTF???
The main question here is whether 実質的な負担 is the final total ER or whether it has to be added to all other fees???

Second, I've tried to compare dividends. Since all the funds follow same index, I assumed that dividends should be almost same, but for some reason the SBI search tool (which doesn't work today because of maintenance, so no link) shows ~2.5% for 1680, but only 1.5% for 1550. Why???
I tried to lookup dividends in their datasheets, but only 1680 shows 分配金利回り 2.19%, while 1550 shows only the actual 分配金 in yen, and no percentage.
When comparing 分配金 for 1550 and 1680 (http://www.am.mufg.jp/fund/181550.html#tab_outline vs https://www.nikkoam.com/products/etf/li ... -ko/bunpai), it's 1,880円 for 100 shares (100口) for 1550 and 50円80銭 for 1 share for 1680, i.e. 1880 vs 5080 - more than twofold difference! How could it be for the same index??
I couldn't find any dividend info for Nissei fund (I understand, that it is 配当見込み, but still there should be info about those reinvested dividends somewhere).

So if my calculation of ER are correct, than ETF have much higher ER than MF.

But even more important than that, if 配当見込み thing for MF means that the dividends are reinvested BEFORE tax (actually, I couldn't find any source in Japanese which clearly says that, and my level of Japanese is not good enough to read all the fine print, so it would be great if someone could confirm that it is correct), then outside of NISA MF would be much better even if it had higher ER.
For example, provided that totally 500 man yen is invested in the fund and 10 man + dividends are reinvested monthly, and ER are as calculated above, dividends are 1.5%, ETF purchase fee is 150 yen, then total yearly fees + taxes for MF would be 1.1 man yen, and for ETF - a whopping 4.5 (a half due to the taxes on dividends!).

By the way, while reading other posts, I noticed than people often think that if they choose an option to automatically reinvest dividends, than they won't have to pay taxes on them, but I think it is misunderstanding. Those dividends will be reinvested after taxes (when outside of NISA). Only the 配当見込み kind of MF reinvest before taxes .

Now, with regard to this new Rakuten proxy VT - the ER is 0,2296, so better than 1550 or 1689, but worse than Nissei fund, and it doesn't reinvest dividends before TAX, and there will be additional 10% US tax on them. Plus, it doesn't have the advantage of foreign fund for those who plan to leave Japan in future. So, good try, but no, thanks.

So far it seems that ニッセイ-<購入・換金手数料なし>ニッセイ外国株式インデックスファンド beats hands down Rakuten VT and the ETF, but could there be any flaw in my calculations?

Other questions are: why such huge difference in dividends for the same index, does 配当見込み really reinvest before tax, and how to find out the reinvested dividends for 配当見込み funds?

Thanks to all who read till the end ;)
User avatar
RetireJapan
Site Admin
Posts: 4434
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2017 6:57 am
Location: Sendai
Contact:

Re: Nerd's comparison of MSCI Kokusai funds and ETF

Post by RetireJapan »

Hi Ori

That is a fantastic list of questions: hopefully we can find the answers for you :)
English teacher and writer. RetireJapan founder. Avid reader.

eMaxis Slim Shady 8-)
Roman Empire
Regular
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:24 am

Re: Nerd's comparison of MSCI Kokusai funds and ETF

Post by Roman Empire »

The Nissay index fund follows the MSCI Kokusai index. It tracks over 1,300 large and mid cap shares across over 20 developed markets excluding Japan. In comparison, the Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) tracks over 7,500 stocks from about 50 developed and emerging markets including Japan. So it offers different exposure than the Nissay fund tracking the MSCI Kokusai index. The additional 0.0108% charges of the Nissay fund are just audit fees. Hope others can find answers to some of your other questions!
Ori
Veteran
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2017 2:16 pm
Location: Kanagawa

Re: Nerd's comparison of MSCI Kokusai funds and ETF

Post by Ori »

Yes, VT/VTI have different asset allocation than MSCI Kokusai, so strictly speaking it is incorrect to compare them directly, but since I'm now selecting funds for my US/Dev/Emerging/Japan portfolio, I've thrown it in the pool and then quickly kicked out :)

Actually, I think I've found answer to my question regarding the discrepancy in dividends. It appears that despite both 1550 and 1680 claiming they follow same index, they have completely different asset allocation:
1550 has 65% in US stocks and 7% in UK, while with 1680 it's somewhat unclear, but it's that it has 65% US in SP E-mini fund, 25% in German fund etc (p.6 https://www.nikkoam.com/files/fund_pdf/ ... 00moku.pdf). S
Since Nissei fund has same allocation as 1550, it seems that 1680 is a different one, but my Japanese ability is not enough to understand what's going on with it.
Anyway, I think I will go with Nissei as it clearly has smaller ER and icing on a cake with dividend reinvestment.
For NISA account I'm now trying to compare VT + some hedged Japanese Emerging MF (to achieve desired Emerging to Dev ratio) vs. combination of all Japanese MF. I need to invest a lump sum directly in USD, so VT looks attractive for this purpose.
Akatani
Regular
Posts: 66
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 3:50 pm

Re: Nerd's comparison of MSCI Kokusai funds and ETF

Post by Akatani »

The Nissei doesn't pay out dividends. It's designed for long term investment, so is more tax efficient. I have a similar mutual fund by mitsui sumitomo that also doesn't pay out dividends, but the prices increase more than with 1550.
I'm not sure which is better so I have both 1550 and mitsui sumitomo (and nissei in ideco!)
Roman Empire
Regular
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:24 am

Re: Nerd's comparison of MSCI Kokusai funds and ETF

Post by Roman Empire »

There are many ways to build your portfolio. It’s fine to compare the Nissay fund that tracks the MSCI Kokusai index directly with ETFs as broad as VT as long as you realise they offer different exposures.

For example, if you select the Nissay fund you may decide you still want to get some exposure to Japanese shares or emerging markets. It’s totally possible to get that exposure through investing in other funds, whether active or index, or ETFs.
Post Reply