Retirement planning
Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2024 12:50 pm
After reading a couple of good articles about retirement planning on one of Ben's recent Monday Reads, I've been thinking a bit more about this.
One article suggested that we should have a cash bucket of up to five years living expenses. Or, more accurately, living expenses minus income (since we'll hopefully all get some kind of pension income in retirement). This sounds like overkill, but the idea is that we only top up the cash bucket in a year when our stock/bond portfolio has risen. It's unlikely to fall five years in a row, so we should be able to hold on without ever selling after a drop.
I like this idea, but can imagine it would get a bit nerve-racking if the portfolio drops more often than rises and the cash bucket becomes dangerously low. However, any retirement plan that relies on a stock/bond portfolio would be pretty nerve-racking in this event!
The problem/challenge we have is that most of our income will be in GBP. Two full UK state pensions (hopefully) and a few small private pensions from the time we worked there. So our pension income will be at the mercy of the GBP.JPY rate. My wife suggested that we keep the UK pensions in GBP if the rate is low, and transfer it when it's high, but what is "low" and what is "high"? Also, how can we fund our retirement when the rate stays "low" for a number of years? A compromise might be to have a rate boundary of, say, 150, and transfer it monthly (or when received) if the rate is anything above this, otherwise leave it accumulating in the UK until the rate is above 150 again.
Any thoughts on all this? I wonder if currently retired expats have large cash buckets and/or only transfer non-JPY pension income when the rate is good?
Of course another approach is to just forget about it until the time comes, then play it by ear. Maybe this is what the majority of retirees do? We won't know our exact circumstances until we get there (e.g. extra income from part-time work, the size of our portfolio, etc.), so why overplan it until then?
One article suggested that we should have a cash bucket of up to five years living expenses. Or, more accurately, living expenses minus income (since we'll hopefully all get some kind of pension income in retirement). This sounds like overkill, but the idea is that we only top up the cash bucket in a year when our stock/bond portfolio has risen. It's unlikely to fall five years in a row, so we should be able to hold on without ever selling after a drop.
I like this idea, but can imagine it would get a bit nerve-racking if the portfolio drops more often than rises and the cash bucket becomes dangerously low. However, any retirement plan that relies on a stock/bond portfolio would be pretty nerve-racking in this event!
The problem/challenge we have is that most of our income will be in GBP. Two full UK state pensions (hopefully) and a few small private pensions from the time we worked there. So our pension income will be at the mercy of the GBP.JPY rate. My wife suggested that we keep the UK pensions in GBP if the rate is low, and transfer it when it's high, but what is "low" and what is "high"? Also, how can we fund our retirement when the rate stays "low" for a number of years? A compromise might be to have a rate boundary of, say, 150, and transfer it monthly (or when received) if the rate is anything above this, otherwise leave it accumulating in the UK until the rate is above 150 again.
Any thoughts on all this? I wonder if currently retired expats have large cash buckets and/or only transfer non-JPY pension income when the rate is good?
Of course another approach is to just forget about it until the time comes, then play it by ear. Maybe this is what the majority of retirees do? We won't know our exact circumstances until we get there (e.g. extra income from part-time work, the size of our portfolio, etc.), so why overplan it until then?