Good question and one I've been wondering myself.
I did some very rough calculations using a
compound interest calculator. Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong.
===============================================
Tsumitate NISA: 400k per year for 20 years.
Let's use a conservative 3% return compounded annually.
Compounded, that's 11M over 20 years, for a total of 8M invested. Approx return of 37%.
NISA: 1.2M per year for 5 years.
Compounded that's 6.4 Million
But then we have another 15 years of no new additions, still earning interest at 3%
Produces a total of 10M, for 6M invested. Approx return of 67%.
NISA pays about twice as much as Tsumitate NISA.
===============================================
Let's up the interest to 8%:
Tsumitate:
Invest 8M, end up with 18M, approx return 125%
NISA:
Invest 6M, end up with 22M, approx return 260%.
NISA pays double again.
===============================================
So unless I've made a massive miscalculation, NISA's ability to get more invested quickly and thus compounding for longer means you earn about twice as much return than you would maxing out a Tsumitate over the same period.
Of course this depends on the NISA system lasting for 20 years...
Edit to add spreadsheet from below, for the TLDR people.
adamu wrote: ↑Sun Feb 21, 2021 4:11 am
I created a 20 year simulation spreadsheet here where you can change the interest rate:
https://retirewiki.jp/wiki/File:NISA_vs ... _NISA.xlsx
The numbers are different yet again, but the conclusion the same: NISA performs better than Tsumitate over the same 20 year period with a constant interest rate if you max them both out ASAP.