Considering the performance of Japanese bonds, do you really want your international bonds to mirror them?adamu wrote: ↑Sat Jul 11, 2020 9:57 am I read that Pinebridge article, but came to the opposite conclusion. Interesting that the investment company recommends that you should buy their hedged funds (which they can charge fees for), and then also buy an FX product from them to add back in the currency exposure (which they can charge some more fees for). "The transaction cost of currency hedging should not be much of a concern in today’s market". But we want to invest for tomorrow's market, and we don't know what that will look like.
Look at this graph, from the document:
Their conclusion is that hedging reduces volatility, thus is good. But in this graph, it's the unhedged version that most closely represents the performance of the index. As mentioned earlier in the thread, hedging makes the international bonds behave more like domestic ones.
So I guess the real question is: Do you want your bond portfolio to represent domestic bond performance, but want to diversify in case the local government defaults? Hedge. Do you want your bond portfolio to represent global performance? Don't hedge.
Am I missing something here?
Would it not be better just to buy the unhedged version?
All of our savings are in Yen anyways. So is it not better to expose ourselves to a different currency?
Or split the difference 75/25% between Unhedged Internation and Domestic?
I just have questions here, no real answers. However, I am leaning towards unhedged.