Ordinarily investing vs iDeco investing

User avatar
RetireJapan
Site Admin
Posts: 4739
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2017 6:57 am
Location: Sendai
Contact:

Re: Ordinarily investing vs iDeco investing

Post by RetireJapan »

Love the website. Looks great. You could include the tax benefits of iDeCo in the description, trying to work out how much it is worth would be complex, as it depends on the person's marginal tax rate, etc.
English teacher and writer. RetireJapan founder. Avid reader.

eMaxis Slim Shady 8-)
adamtokyo
Newbie
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2018 12:46 am

Re: Ordinarily investing vs iDeco investing

Post by adamtokyo »

Thanks!

Perhaps I could create a separate Ideco section which illustrates a salaryman/woman on an average income tax rate of 25% and make it clear the income tax rate varies for each individual.

Then I could maybe show how much extra the salaryman's monthly contributions would grow in an Ideco. E.g. at 25% income tax, their ¥20,000 monthly contributions become ¥25,000 thanks to the income tax relief.

But is that calculation that simple / correct?

If it is then I could show how much 25,000 could grow to for the same time range to illustrate just how much of a difference this makes when compounded.


Then explain how any growth is partially protected by tax instead of giving an exact figure.
User avatar
RetireJapan
Site Admin
Posts: 4739
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2017 6:57 am
Location: Sendai
Contact:

Re: Ordinarily investing vs iDeco investing

Post by RetireJapan »

You could just link to the government simulation here: http://dc-center.jp/checker/
English teacher and writer. RetireJapan founder. Avid reader.

eMaxis Slim Shady 8-)
adamtokyo
Newbie
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2018 12:46 am

Re: Ordinarily investing vs iDeco investing

Post by adamtokyo »

Yeah I'll probably just do that. I might however explain the principle using unrealistic yet illustrative figures as I think people will be surprised by the tax relief going in. Back to the drawing board :-)

Thanks for all your help
Post Reply