Re: iDeCo for Americans and the FBAR
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2022 2:28 am
So my Rakuten Shoken iDeCo is listed as 外国株式 , which I believe is a mutual fund?
Can I change to a time deposit?
Can I change to a time deposit?
Personal Finance for Residents of Japan
https://retirejapan.com/forum/
You are invested in a foreign stock fund. Yes it will be a mutual fund.
Yes, that is incorrect! The amounts listed earlier in this post (foreign assets are more than $50,000 at year end or greater than $75,000 at any time during the year) for form 8938 are for individuals living in the United States who are unmarried! The amounts you have listed are correct for expats. Nice catch. Thanks!captainspoke wrote: ↑Thu Apr 21, 2022 1:20 pm I'm puzzled. On the instructions for form 8938, I see amounts that are greater than specified in comments above:
https://www.irs.gov/instructions/i8938Taxpayers living outside the United States. If your tax home is in a foreign country, you meet one of the presence abroad tests described next, and no exception applies, file Form 8938 with your income tax return if you satisfy the reporting threshold discussed next that applies to you.
Unmarried taxpayers. If you are not married, you satisfy the reporting threshold only if the total value of your specified foreign financial assets is more than $200,000 on the last day of the tax year or more than $300,000 at any time during the tax year.
Married taxpayers filing a joint income tax return. If you are married and you and your spouse file a joint income tax return, you satisfy the reporting threshold only if the total value of your specified foreign financial assets is more than $400,000 on the last day of the tax year or more than $600,000 at any time during the tax year.
Married taxpayers filing separate income tax returns. If you are married and file a separate income tax return from your spouse, you satisfy the reporting threshold only if the total value of your specified foreign financial assets is more than $200,000 on the last day of the tax year or more than $300,000 at any time during the tax year.
Assuming your wife doesn't have an IRS problem, does she already use NISA? That might be better than iDeCo for a non-income tax paying person. Of course both work well too, but if I were to choose between the two NISA seems a better option.esotEric wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 6:13 am
1. My wife is a Japanese national who doesn't work/pay income tax. I file with the IRS as "head of household"; she doesn't have any involvement with US tax filing. My understanding is that she can contribute 23,000 yen/mo (presumably from my earnings). She'll be 60 in 10 years, and we have to get the money back when she's between the ages of 60-70. If the account is in her name, I won't save anything on my income tax, but we wouldn't have to pay tax on any earnings on the investment (dividends, increase in fund value, etc.). Taking into account fees and the limited time frame, would this still be worthwhile?
I the five year limit on the NISA was a drawback, but I guess if you can roll it over multiple times it's not. I guess I should look into NISA more. What do you see at the benefit of NISA over iDeCo?RetireJapan wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 6:46 amAssuming your wife doesn't have an IRS problem, does she already use NISA? That might be better than iDeCo for a non-income tax paying person. Of course both work well too, but if I were to choose between the two NISA seems a better option.esotEric wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 6:13 am
1. My wife is a Japanese national who doesn't work/pay income tax. I file with the IRS as "head of household"; she doesn't have any involvement with US tax filing. My understanding is that she can contribute 23,000 yen/mo (presumably from my earnings). She'll be 60 in 10 years, and we have to get the money back when she's between the ages of 60-70. If the account is in her name, I won't save anything on my income tax, but we wouldn't have to pay tax on any earnings on the investment (dividends, increase in fund value, etc.). Taking into account fees and the limited time frame, would this still be worthwhile?
Really good question about how the iDeCo 'pension' option works. I have to admit I am not sure! Will look into it.
The NISA is being completely revamped. New details will be released this month. Until then all information will be outdated.esotEric wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 8:49 amI the five year limit on the NISA was a drawback, but I guess if you can roll it over multiple times it's not. I guess I should look into NISA more. What do you see at the benefit of NISA over iDeCo?RetireJapan wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 6:46 amAssuming your wife doesn't have an IRS problem, does she already use NISA? That might be better than iDeCo for a non-income tax paying person. Of course both work well too, but if I were to choose between the two NISA seems a better option.esotEric wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 6:13 am
1. My wife is a Japanese national who doesn't work/pay income tax. I file with the IRS as "head of household"; she doesn't have any involvement with US tax filing. My understanding is that she can contribute 23,000 yen/mo (presumably from my earnings). She'll be 60 in 10 years, and we have to get the money back when she's between the ages of 60-70. If the account is in her name, I won't save anything on my income tax, but we wouldn't have to pay tax on any earnings on the investment (dividends, increase in fund value, etc.). Taking into account fees and the limited time frame, would this still be worthwhile?
Really good question about how the iDeCo 'pension' option works. I have to admit I am not sure! Will look into it.