What I mean is that the difference between Fidelity's "zero expense ratio" fund and funds like eMaxis or Vanguard is within 10 basis points for fees (Vanguard funds get down to around 3 basis points or 0.03%, eMaxis is around 10 or 11 basis points or 0.11% for the yearly expense ratio). The actual efficiencies from running the fund in ways that are not reflected by the expense ratio and the tracking error against the targeted index are in that range so the last time I checked the final return on Fidelity's zero expense all US stock market fund was actually a little below Vanguard's version of that index fund even though Vanguard is charging around 4 basis points of expense.Thanks for your reply. I am not going to pretend to know how the different funds perform because I am a rookie but I just wanted to touch on the 10 BP you mentioned. Do you mean that eMAXIS has extra 10 BP in interest value (versus FIL or Schwab) that I should be wary of?
See for instance:
https://www.marketwatch.com/tools/mutua ... re=Returns