RetireJapan wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 3:15 am
sutebayashi wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 2:28 am
I think in an ideal state the pension system would be wound down completely and only iDeCo style accounts left
I think that would be incredibly dangerous as it passes all the risk to the individual, and we can see how well the average person is doing at saving and investing.
More dangerous than the status quo?
The risk is with the individual either way, it’s their future livelihood that is at stake.
In the vast majority of cases, I personally would back the adult individual to make better decisions for him/her/themself than what a meeting room of lawmakers or bureaucrats can come up with, with their minds focused on the next election cycle or whatever.
Maybe I am too optimistic.
Maybe something like Australia's Superannuation fund would be an option, where it's like iDeCo but compulsory?
I am not familiar with Australia’s system, but yes, “compulsory iDeCo” is more what I have in mind.
There would need to be a transition period (which I skip over although it’s the hard part), but ultimately instead of paying taxes for the unsustainable pay-as-you-go scheme, people would pay solely into their own personal pension fund and manage it for themselves, according to their own personal objectives. After reaching a certain size of fund, the person could even be exempted from making further compulsory contribution. This gives people more control over their own lives, which I regard as a good thing.
Is that “the average person” you mention really not capable of making adequate decisions for themself, or is that just a byproduct of the existing system that lulls people into a false sense of security? With the impetus, I think the majority would do fine. (And it could really boost your business opportunities:))