The ETF I was referring to in the previous post was 1582, a passive iShares ETF tracking the MSCI Emerging IMI index (as all iShares product, managed by BlackRock, also no small fry in investment world). It was not by any means a fancy choice, just the passive ETF with the lowest ER at the time for emerging market equities. The reason it was liquidated was not mismanagement or otherwise; BlackRock just decided to introduce a new ETF lineup to TSE which was structured differently, and they closed all their previous Tokyo-traded iShares products to do so.EmaxisSlim Cultist wrote: ↑Mon Oct 25, 2021 11:39 am I would not extend this to the funds commonly recommended on this site: Emaxis Slim (All Country/Developed Countries and S&p500 funds) along with Rakuten-Vanguard products.
1. Rakuten Vanguard products invest in the American ETFs. It is harder to get safer than that. (VTI/VOO)
2. Emaxis Slim Products have a massive amount under management, track indexes that are well understood, and are managed by MUFJ the world's biggest bank outside of China. These are passive investments.
Now if you want to talk about active funds, ESG wraps, and the like. Absolutely, there is a huge risk.
Are Emaxis Slim products and Rakuten wraps for Vanguard ETFs headed the same way? Unlikely I suppose, but I wouldn't be so sure that the risk is zero over a 20-year period.